|
|
Post by michael on May 28, 2006 8:08:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lildebcc on May 28, 2006 19:30:13 GMT -5
How would this guy know size, color, and shape of this supposed rectangular UFO, if he and his girlfriend didn't even see the picture until days later, and didn't realize it was there when the picture was taken? And how can he say the estimated size of the object was "very big" if he didn't see it other than in the picture? "Very big" as compared to what?
The enlargements and enhancements don't do anything for the photo's credibility.
I don't know. To me, in the original photo, it looks like a bird or a plane (superman?) or something; and maybe when they saw the photo they decided to photo shop some object in there on when it was enlarged. Would be nice to see the negative - oh right digital, forget that! Something on the lens maybe?
What can I say, I am really skeptical when it comes to 'evidence photos'. Then again, I wouldn't be a very good ghost hunter if I took everything at face value and didn't question, question, question.
>^o.o^<
|
|
