|
|
Post by nearkeith on Dec 23, 2006 16:23:48 GMT -5
If you have any serious opinions on this footage, please use the link on the page to contact the producers of the documentary: digital3media.com/ngm/news.htm. (You'll have to scroll about half-way down the page to view the video). |
|
|
|
Post by aneaglesangel on Dec 23, 2006 19:30:32 GMT -5
Keith, the link is bad, I can't wait to see it!!
Yay! Link fixed, thanks Keith!
|
|
|
|
Post by aneaglesangel on Dec 24, 2006 9:27:20 GMT -5
Oooh, it's the film of the orbs. I find this interesting! I recently got some 'butt orbs' (LOL) that could be seen with the naked eye, dancing around me. I'm glad to see that orbs are getting a little bit of attention, for I do believe that in some cases, orbs really are related to spirit activity. I've also seen an orb on two occasions with my naked eye. (As opposed to my fully dressed eye, LOL) Very interesting footage, I keep watching it and trying to figure out what caused the anomoly here. One thing that does interest me, is the way they move. They seem to be focused on staying around Sandra's face. They definitely don't seem to be moving on air currents but are hovering around! Interesting to say the least!!
|
|
|
|
Post by lildebcc on Dec 24, 2006 9:51:04 GMT -5
All I can think of are small insects. They might have actually been crawling on the camera lense. Could have been some tiny creatures flying close to the lense too.
>^o.o^<
|
|
|
|
Post by aneaglesangel on Dec 26, 2006 11:34:02 GMT -5
Hmm, I thought possibly bugs when I watched this. A couple points, they seem to almost disappear in some parts of the footage, but then reappear. Yes, this could be caused by the light source changing and not reflecting. But this is Sandra Johnson, and I do believe if she felt bugs so close to her face she would have said something. I know Keith and Sandra are very honest people, and they wouldn't try to pass bugs off as anything but bugs if that's what they thought they had. Insects that can fly have to beat their wings to do it. I think with them coming so close to her face, she would have felt it!
|
|
|
|
Post by lildebcc on Dec 26, 2006 23:50:13 GMT -5
Oh, I am not saying that they are trying to pass things off for something they are not or that they are less than honest people, but it is something to consider. Even the honest of people can be mistaken. I was thinking more nats/little black flying creature things. Could have been close to the lense, you never know. Then again, could have been some talented scary dust.
Would have been interesting to see the same footage from a couple of different angles; might have shown something different, you never know.
Who can say what it really is. Without proof positive, we can only make guesstimates. I still question the pictures that I have that have no logical explanation.
>^o.o^<
|
|
|
|
Post by mmecurie68 on Jan 17, 2007 21:24:59 GMT -5
I found the "comet tails" of the orbs to be the most interesting part of the footage. They were very irregular. Also, you can see multiple objects moving in different directions with these streaking tails.
I would expect a technical flaw to remain fairly constant in relation to the position of the shot. This does not appear to be the case with this footage.
In my observations of "dust orbs" - they tend to be very regular and spherical in shape - these are not.
The footage I have seen of "insect orbs" - you see irregular shapes, but I haven't seen those lingering streaks like those around Sandra's face.
It would have been interesting if an orthogonal method of imaging had been used in conjunction with the regular filming, like thermal (of course, if you can't see it while you're filming, how would you know to use it, but since I'm just throwin' my two cents around...)
|
|
|
|
Post by aneaglesangel on Jan 18, 2007 10:56:12 GMT -5
Good point madame! I've heard lots of complaints from other investigators where they wish there had been more than one camera, or using different types of cameras were needed. I think every day we learn to use and try different techniques, and it helps all of us do a better job capturing evidence! The only problem I can see with using multiple cams, is that some groups just don't have the equipment. Funny but some groups do have the equipment, and just don't bother to use it, I'm not sure why, but if I had as much as some groups do, I'd sure as heck put the stuff to good use. In a huge building though, it would be hard to cover one spot with multiple cams, since most times, you're better of covering more places. Just my two cents too.....LOL!
|
|
